Become a Member

Blog

Paradise Canyon vs. the Virgin Valley Water District, A PublicTrust Issue.

According to Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 533.025, all water sources in Nevada, above and below ground, are publicly owned. ​ This principle underpins the State’s legal and ethical obligations to water management entities. ​

On April 24, 2025, Nevada Supreme Court Justice Lidia S. Stiglich, with Ron D. Parraguirre and Linda Marie Bell concurring, gave the Virgin Valley Water District Board (VVWDB) in Mesquite, Nevada, sole and absolute discretion to set the rental rate on irrigation water they delivered after January 1, 2020, and by default giving the same rate-setting authority to SNWA authorities to divert the Water to Lake Mead.

Public Ownership of Water in Nevada

The disputed publicly owned water was initially appropriated under the 1927 Virgin River Decree to Mesquite Irrigation Company (MIC) and Bunkerville Irrigation Company (BIC) stockholders for local area irrigation.

A Dying Irrigation Market

However, by the early ’90s, a dying dairy and agriculture market required rebuilding the community economy into a retirement area and tourist and gaming mecca, thus shifting the water demand from highly polluted Decreed water for declining irrigation to somewhat cleaner groundwater for rising domestic requirements.

As golf courses, gaming, and homeowner associations replaced irrigated lands, much of the undiverted Water flowed freely downstream to Lake Mead.

Virgin Valley Water District as stock brokers

In 1993, the Nevada Legislature established the Virgin Valley Water District (VVWD), requiring it to deliver better-quality groundwater from Virgin River Basin 222 for Mesquite-Bunkerville’s domestic needs. 

Nonetheless, once formed, Decreed Water stockholders took control of the Virgin Valley Water District Board. They began acquiring Water at a baseline price of $900.00 per share for one MIC stock.

They argued that such share purchases of stocks were necessary for a future time when they would tax the rate holders to pay for the cleaning of the Water essential for domestic use.[1]

Thus began the Water Board’s practice of joining the Irrigation Companies as a leasing agent, effectively making the Water Board a stockbroker.

Raising Rates

As stockholders continued to dominate the Board, they increased the share price to $5,524.90 for a BIC stock in 1996, rising to $8,287.00 in 1997 with a MIC stock at $6,000. By 2005, stockholders on the water board had gifted $31,500 for BIC stock and $22,806 for MIC, a stock share.

Also, in 2005, the Southern Nevada Water Association entered the Virgin River market and paid $11,686,500.00 for 350 BIC water stocks at $33,390.00 per share.

 In 2008, the VVWDB raised BIC stock price to $86,000 per share while establishing $65,000 as the per-share value for MIC stock shares. [2]

Also, in 2008, under a federally authorized contracting program, the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) began using its public funds to pay Virgin River stockholders for unused irrigation water, arguably increasing the amount of Water flowing into Lake Mead.

In 2009, SNWA authorities purchased 1 BIC stock share at $80,056.23 and partially purchased 5 BIC shares for $400,281.15, amounting to $80,056.23 per share.

By 2010, the SNWA had moved to replace the VVWDB as a rate-setting stock broker by purchasing and leasing MIC and BIC stock shares to, on paper, show them reallocated from irrigation diversions in the Mesquite-Bunkerville areas as authorized under the 1927 Virgin River decree to flow into Lake Mead, thus servicing the beneficial use of SNWA customers in the Las Vegas Metropolitan area.

 VVWD ended its activities due to potential profits from the SNWA reallocating program. By then, the VVWDB had spent $12,159,670.86 of ratepayer funds to acquire 549 stock shares they subleased (rented) (but did not deliver)[3] to local golf courses and occasionally to a local farm.  

Legal dispute

In 2018, the owners of Paradise Canyon (DBA the Wolf Creek Golf Course) alleged that the members of the Virgin Valley Water District Board violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in raising their irrigation water rate from $250 to $1,115 per share an increase of 346%.

While the trial proceeded, on September 17, 2020, Nevada Supreme Court Justice Lidia S. Stiglich, who authored the Paradise Canyon Ruling, this time with Mark Gibbons, James William Hardesty, and Ellisa F. Cadish, ruled after oral arguments in the Walker Case, that the public trust doctrine does not permit reallocating water rights already adjudicated and settled under the doctrine of prior appropriation. Nonetheless, SNWA authorities continued applying VVWDB rate-setting standards to acquire and reallocate MIC and BIC stock shares to Lake Mead, a process arguably denied by Stiglich and other Justices in the Walker Case.

On June 5, 2023, the Jury concluded that when the owners of Paradise Canyon signed a contract with the VVWDB in June 2011, they had a justified expectation that the local market around the City of Mesquite on and after January 1, 2020, would exclude rates paid by The Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) upon which the Water District claimed they based its increased price to $1,200 per share. The Jury then set a fair rate of leased irrigation shares at $300 and awarded the owners of Paradise Canyon $811,000 in damages.

In the meantime, by the end of 2023, the SNWA had gifted $56,423,220.73 to stockholders of MIC and BIC in their diversion effort to Lake Mead.

Then, on April 24, 2025, Nevada Supreme Court Justice Lidia S. Stiglich, with Ron D. Parraguirre and Linda Marie Bell concurring, gave the Virgin Valley Water District Board (VVWDB) in Mesquite, Nevada, sole and absolute discretion to set the rental rate on irrigation water they delivered after January 1, 2020, and by default giving the same rate-setting authority to SNWA authorities to divert the Water to Lake Mead.

Questions of ethics, public Trust, and fiduciary responsibilities

The Justice Stiglich, Parraguirre, and Bell rulings suggest gifting $12,159,670.86 in public funds to those holding stocks in MIC and BIC through rate setting, which set the terms for SNWA to gift another $56,423,220.73 in public funds to the stockholders of MIC and BIC for a total of 68,582,891.59 funds for publically owned but not longer used appropriated irrigation water complies with fiduciary ethical requirements, as governed by the  Nevada Commission on Ethics.

Further, the Justices seem to feel that contrary to the Walker ruling,  the WVWDB has sole and absolute discretion to set rates that ultimately allow for reallocating appropriated water rights away from the  Decreed area to benefit the population of the Las Vegas Metropolitan area.

Future options

 If approved by the Wolf Creek Golf course owners, the attorneys for Paradise Canyon have several options. First, they can appeal to the entire Supreme Court for a review of the three Justices’ ruling.

Since the three judges remanded the case to the lower court, it could result in a new trial.

In either case, the potential may exist to define the VVWDB rate-setting strategy as a violation of the covenant of good faith, leading directly to SNWA’s question of purchasing and leasing of Decreed water for reappropriation to Lake Mead an explicit public trust and fiduciary violation as stated by Stiglich, and the other Justices in the Walker Case.

A complete review of this case is posted at Mesquitewateralliance.com


[1] Current plans project cleaning the Decreed river water for domestic use in 2035, continuing to 2061, for $60 million in capital expenses. The effort remains highly speculative for several reasons, including costs and overappropriation of surface water primarily by the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

[2] The difference between BIC and MIC stock shares comes from an assumption that more water comes from BIC shares thn from MIC shares.

[3] The VVWDB does not deliver the water; they profit from leasing (renting) stock shares paid for with ratepayer funds. Local delivery of that source comes via traditional ditches and pipes constructed by the Irrigation Companies.

How To Destroy the Supreme Court

As I write this, the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has just concluded the oral arguments in the birthright citizenship case. The case they are deciding, however, is not about the constitutionality of birthright citizenship but rather whether or not local and regional judges have the authority to issue injunctions that apply nationwide. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, speaking for the Department of Justice (DOJ), argued that they do not. But New Jersey’s Solicitor General, Jeremy Feigenbaum, and attorney Kelsi Corkran, Supreme Court director at the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law School, both argued that they do.

Buried in the questions and answers between SCOTUS and the Solicitor General is a small aside that I believe is likely to be the most significant issue in the case. It clearly shows what Trump and the DOJ intend to do in the future:

Justice Sonia Sotomayor asked the solicitor general if, based on the government’s arguments that nationwide injunctions encroach on executive branch powers, the Supreme Court would have the authority to issue a nationwide injunction.

Solicitor General D. John Sauer said the government’s stance is that the Supreme Court would not have the power to issue such an injunction.” (1)

The Solicitor General’s response is very telling. It says that the Trump administration does not consider the Court as “supreme” in any sense of the word. The implication is that only the Executive Branch has the authority to act on the nation as a whole.

This would, of course, completely negate any Judicial Branch “checks and balances” on the Executive Branch. It would leave Trump free to become the dictator that he wants to be by simply declaring that any actions he takes apply “nationwide.” SCOTUS would be powerless; unable to rule against him.

Trump has always sought to achieve total unconstrained power. The Republican-led House and Senate have shown that they’re more than willing to be mere rubber stamps for Trump (echoing the political structures in other dictatorial countries like North Korea, Russia, and China). The GOP’s cowardice effectively removes all Congressional “checks and balances” on the Executive Branch as well, so much so that it becomes a news headline if a Republican in Congress actually speaks out in opposition to a Trump policy.

I seem to recall an old saying: “death by a thousand cuts.” That is what the United States of America is being subjected to right now. Each individual cut may seem trivial in the context of so many happening at once, but, taken together, they may well cause the death of our Republic.

(1) https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/15/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-nationwide-injunctions/

NV Dems Slam Mark Amodei For Pushing House Republicans To Sell Pieces of Nevada to Fund Tax Breaks For Billionaires
This is a press release issued on May 8, 2025 by the Nevada Democratic Party.

Nevada Democrats slammed Mark Amodei after he pushed House Republicans to change federal law that ensures that proceeds from federal land sales in Southern Nevada stay in Nevada. As another part of his scheme to cut taxes for billionaires by screwing over working Nevadans, in the dead of the night, Amodei sold out working families and voted to take even more money out of Nevada’s pocket.

Senator Catherine Cortez Masto and Congresswoman Susie Lee introduced the Southern Nevada Economic Development and Conservation Act — a balanced lands solution, meticulously negotiated with and supported by Nevadan local stakeholders, that would enable Clark County to pursue new development responsibly while safeguarding our most precious public lands for conservation and recreation – all while ensuring that proceeds from land sales in Nevada stay in Nevada.

Read more below: 

Las Vegas Sun: Amodei’s public land sale amendment sparks backlash from Nevada Democrats and tribal advocates

Key points:

Nevada’s vast public lands, long a flashpoint in state-federal tensions, could be used to generate federal revenue under an amendment to the GOP’s comprehensive spending package.

The provision put forward by Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Celeste Maloy of Utah would allow the sale of thousands of acres of public lands in the two states. The plan is raising concerns with advocates and Democrats who worry it will disrupt tribal lands, historic monuments and local projects funded through state land purchases.

 The amendment would affect Clark, Washoe, Lyon, and Pershing counties.

His congressional colleagues don’t agree that it’s a “Nevada-centric” pitch. The worry from Nevada Democrats isn’t new; its three House representatives and two senators have been rallying against the budget reconciliation efforts since February for its potential cuts to Medicaid. Now, Amodei’s 33-page amendment builds on those preexisting woes, with the members of Congress’ minority party warning it would disturb the status-quo of land sale money going directly towards Nevada.

“For decades, federal law has ensured that proceeds from land sales in southern Nevada stay in Nevada,” said Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev, in a statement. “Last night’s traitorous maneuver instead would send Nevada’s land proceeds to Washington to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.
 
Lee’s mention of the decades-old practice is about the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act, which enables a bargaining process with the Bureau of Land Management and use of that revenue to fund some conservation projects. Use of the act and other land-release initiatives are generally bipartisan issues — with Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, working to release some of over 80% of federally-owned land for the purpose of building affordable housing.

Amodei’s amendment progressed with a 24-19 vote, with Colorado’s Jeff Hurd as the only Republican to join the Democrats in opposition. The measure now faces a full House vote.

Amodei’s office shared maps of federal lands in areas this measure could impact, including one with public land surrounding the Pyramid Lake Paiute Reservation in northwestern Nevada. For the Native Voters Alliance of Nevada, a nonprofit advancing Native American political interests, Amodei’s amendment would complicate already-difficult land recovery efforts for the tribe. 

“You don’t accidentally mark land for disposal right next to a sovereign nation,” said the organization communications’ associate Jonnette Paddy. “You do that when they’re politically convenient to ignore.”
 
When Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., asked if any of the House members from Clark County — Lee and fellow Democratic Nevada Reps. Dina Titus and Steven Horsford — had been consulted for the legislation, Amodei said no. 

“To basically say to them that they have no say as to what happens with respect to land conveyances in their congressional districts,” Neguse said to Amodei. “I think it is a slippery slope.”

Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., who also condemned the amendment and Amodei’s lack of consultation, said the proposal overrides the agreements from her previous bills, including her Pershing County Economic Development and Conservation Act. 

The legislation supports the Lovelock Paiute Tribe’s expansion of their Tribal cemetery alongside other protections for management of public lands and ensuring the revenue from land sales stay in Pershing County. 

It hasn’t been heard during this session of Congress, though it’s garnered support from local leaders like Chairman of the Pershing County Commission Joe Crim Jr.

“I am outraged that Congressman Amodei sold out Nevadans in the dead of night by passing a flawed, hastily-drafted proposal,” Rosen said in a statement. “…. I will not support a Washington-drafted proposal that will lead to Nevada losing out on millions of dollars in funding for our local priorities like education and restoration around the Truckee River.” 

While there wasn’t consultation with the Southern Nevada representatives, Amodei said he had been urged to put the amendment forward by the Clark County Commission “on their behalf as a member of the majority in the House.” Clark County said in a statement that it did not support the proposal.  

Tribal Lands Marked for Sale Near Gold Butte & Other Areas

This is a press release issued by Native Voters Alliance Nevada on May 7, 2025

THIS PROPOSED LAND GRAB INTRODUCED INTO THE RECONCILIATION BILL AFFECTS THE VIRGIN AND MOAPA VALLEYS

Tens of thousands of Acres in Clark, Washoe, and Fernley Targeted in Last-Minute Federal Amendment

**CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE FEDERAL LAND DISPOSAL MAPS REQUESTED BY REPRESENTATIVES AMODEI AND MALLOY***

NEVADA — Just before midnight, Reps. Amodei (NV) and Malloy (UT) introduced a surprise amendment to a sweeping budget reconciliation bill mandating the sell-off of public lands. The move bypassed standard procedures, limited debate, and appeared timed to avoid public scrutiny. Newly released maps confirm the proposal targets areas near Avi Kwa Ame and Gold Butte, an estimated 12,000 acres in Fernley—including land that borders the Pyramid Lake Paiute Reservation—and an estimated 15,000 acres in Washoe County. Even more land is flagged as “eligible for disposal” in future federal land management plans.

Taylor Patterson, Executive Director of Native Voters Alliance Nevada, issued the following statement:

“Let’s call this what it is: a coordinated land grab. It was planned behind closed doors, dropped at midnight, and aimed directly at Tribal homelands.

“We’ve seen the maps. This isn’t theoretical. It is targeted. Lands near Avi Kwa Ame and Gold Butte are in the crosshairs. So are scattered parcels across Clark County. In Fernley, the disposal zone pushes right up against the boundary of the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe, a calculated move that shows how close they’re willing to get.

“These are not excess acres. These are Native lands. And the people advancing this know exactly what they are doing. This is the same story our people have lived through for generations. Erase us, sell what is left, and pretend it was never ours. But it was. And it still is.

“Every inch being sold off was cared for by our people long before this government existed. These lands do not belong to Congress. They belong to the generations who bled, prayed, and survived on them.

“Once land is gone, it is gone. Fences go up. Access disappears. The connection between people and place is severed.

“If you are Indigenous, this is your fight. If you care about public land, clean water, access, or cultural survival, this is your fight too. Because this amendment is not a policy tweak. It is a warning shot. If they can carve up our homelands in silence, they will do it again. And again. Unless we stop them.”

###
About Native Voters Alliance Nevada: A rising powerhouse in the Nevada political landscape, Native Voters Alliance Nevada (NVAN) is dedicated to forging a dynamic Native ecosystem and fostering political strength within Indigenous communities. We serve as a resonating platform for urban and Tribal Nation voices, guiding elections, molding legislation, and championing Tribal sovereignty. Join us in our empowering journey and learn more at https://nativevotesnv.org/.

Legislative Report for 4/5/2025

Legislative Report for 4/5/2025

Source is Nevada Economic Forum, this is an AI generated summary of the report:

On May 1st, 2025, the Nevada Economic Forum released updated revenue projections for the upcoming 2025-2027 biennial budget, which the legislature will use to finalize the state budget. Here’s a breakdown of the fiscal analysis as of that date:

Key Findings:

  • Lower Revenue Projections: The Economic Forum projected approximately $191 million less in general fund revenue for the next two-year budget cycle compared to their previous forecast in December 2024. This represents a 1.6 percent reduction.
  • Significant Impact on Education Funding: The State Education Fund is expected to see a decrease of nearly $160 million from prior projections. This contributes to a total decrease of approximately $350 million in anticipated state funds.
  • Reasons for Downgrade: Economists cited concerns about a potential economic slowdown due to the Trump administration’s trade policies, particularly impacting tourism from Canada, as well as a potentially strained labor force amid reduced immigration and modest gains in unemployment.
  • Sales Tax Decline: A significant portion of the lower revenue projection is attributed to a decrease in sales tax revenue, which was down 3.2 percent compared to the same point last year.
  • Impact on Budgeting: The reduced revenue forecast is expected to lead to budget cuts and could result in the failure of legislative bills with significant price tags.
  • Education Funding Concerns: The substantial drop in projected education funding raises questions about potential expansions to education programs in the coming biennium. Governor Lombardo’s proposed budget had relatively flat per-pupil funding for the next fiscal year, with a slight increase in FY 2027, but this new forecast puts further pressure on education funding.
  • Increased Unemployment Forecast: The Governor’s Finance Office projects that the state’s unemployment rate will rise from 5.69% to 6.55% in the next fiscal year before slightly recovering.
  • Decline in Tourism: Visitor volume is also expected to decrease by 4.4% in FY 2026 before a slight rebound in the following year.

Legislative Activity:

  • Legislative budget committees had been working to close budgets in anticipation of the Economic Forum’s May 1st projections.
  • There were disparities between the Governor’s recommendations and legislative proposals in certain areas, such as funding for the Nevada Knowledge Account.

Overall Outlook:

The fiscal analysis released on May 1st, 2025, paints a concerning picture for Nevada’s upcoming budget cycle. The lower revenue projections, driven by economic uncertainty and declining sales tax, will likely force lawmakers to make difficult decisions regarding budget allocations and potentially scale back or eliminate some planned initiatives. The significant shortfall in projected education funding is a particular area of concern.

It’s important to note that the May 1st forecast from the Economic Forum is the final official revenue estimate that the Legislature must use to balance the budget for the next two fiscal years (2025-2027

Nevada State Democratic Party spokesperson Tai Sims: 

“In an economy that is already struggling under Joe Lombardo, Donald Trump’s reckless tariffs and Elon Musk’s erratic DOGE cuts are devastating working families’ budgets, harming businesses, and forcing the state to contend with sharp declines in revenue projections. With Lombardo’s encouragement, Trump’s reckless tariffs and economic policies are going to force painful budget decisions on the state all the while costing Nevadans jobs and leading to higher costs and less money in people’s pockets.”

Senate Majority Leader Nicole Cannizzaro released the following statement after the Legislature’s Economic Forum projected a nearly $200 million drop in state general fund revenues over the next two years. Economists said that the drop in revenue is a direct result of the damage that the Trump administration’s chaotic economic and trade policies are doing to Nevada’s economy. Today’s projections reflect changes in economic circumstances since the Economic Forum last met in December 2024. 

“The Trump administration’s reckless economic policies are damaging Nevada’s economy, leaving us with a new $200 million gap in the state budget,” said Leader Cannizzaro. “Trump’s trade wars are killing American consumer confidence, reducing both domestic and international tourism to the state, and driving up prices for ordinary Nevadans. Today’s revenue projections show that our economy is now slowing with the potential for job losses and higher inflation on the horizon. Over the remaining few weeks of the session, Senate Democrats will work to minimize the damage and the impact on vital educational, health care, and social services that Nevadans need.” 

For more coverage and analysis, here is an article in the Nevada Independent and The Nevada Current.

The Atrocities Continue

I did not write the following. I only wish I had. I came across it on Quora.com. It was posted as a set of screen shots and the original author was not identified. But I would like to commend whoever wrote this.

They said they were the law.

They said they had a warrant.

They didn’t have the right house.

They didn’t care.

On Thursday, April 24, 2025, in a quiet neighborhood in Oklahoma City, a U.S. citizen named Marisa and her three daughters were violently pulled from sleep by men claiming to be federal agents. ICE. The FBI. The U.S. Marshals. The names shifted, the threats didn’t. They ordered the family out of bed and out of their home – into the cold morning rain – in their undergarments. Rifles trained. Questions barked. No time to dress. No concern that one of the girls was a minor. No pause to reconsider the name on the warrant that didn’t match anyone who lived there. The family had only just moved in two weeks prior.

The men ransacked the house. They took every phone, every laptop, and the family’s life savings in cash — money they’d carried across the country to start over. When Marisa, drenched and humiliated, begged for her phone back so she could find food for her kids, one of the men looked at her and said, with all the smugness of a man who knows he’ll never be held accountable, “I know it was a little rough this morning.”

And then they left.

No names.

No paperwork.

No receipts.

No apologies.

The FBI says it wasn’t them. The U.S. Marshals say the same. ICE has remained silent. Not a single agency will claim responsibility for the raid. No one will explain why the family was targeted, why their possessions were taken, why their rights were trampled. No one has told Marisa how to get her property back. She doesn’t even know which office to call. Her children, once asleep in what they thought was a safe new home, now live with fear that the men will return.

And while all of this unfolded — while a mother and her daughters were treated like fugitives in their own home — another story broke. A different crisis. One that drew national headlines and an immediate law enforcement response.

Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, had her purse stolen at a restaurant in Washington, D.C. A Gucci bag, reportedly containing $3,000 in cash, medications, apartment keys, and her DHS badge, was snatched from beneath her chair. Within hours, two suspects were arrested. The media ran with it. The system worked.

Statements were made. Justice was served. Noem got her purse back.

Marisa is still waiting.

This country protected Kristi Noem’s purse with more urgency than it protected Marisa’s children. It mobilized for luxury leather, but turned its back on a family stripped of dignity, security, and constitutional protection. One woman got swift justice. The other got soaked, robbed, and forgotten.

And make no mistake: this was not a bureaucratic slip-up. This was a test. A flex.

A soft rollout of unchecked power. What happened to Marisa was not just illegal – it was strategic. These were not mistakes. These were messages. That no one is safe. That citizenship means nothing. That the agents of the state can barge in, terrorize a family, take what they want, and vanish – and the country will yawn and move on.

Ask yourself: if Marisa had stood her ground, would she be alive? If her daughter had screamed or resisted, would they be burying her? If this had happened to Kristi Noem’s family, would Congress be holding hearings?

Of course they would. Because in Trump’s America, power protects power. Purses are prioritized. Mothers are expendable.

They took Marisa’s belongings. They left the trauma. And they are betting no one will make noise about it.”

You can read about this incident here:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/us-citizen-family-traumatized-ice-raid-rcna203700

And So It Has Begun….

Recently in the New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/27/opinion/turkey-istanbul-protests.html), the editorial board described the current political situation in Turkey:

“Turkey, at the crossroads of Europe, Asia and the Middle East, is an important American partner, with the second-largest military in NATO. Yet Turkey has been sliding toward autocracy over the past decade. Mr. Erdogan has changed its Constitution to expand his power, brought the courts under his control, manipulated elections, purged professors, shut down media organizations and arrested journalists and protesters.”
“Last month, Mr. Erdogan took the assault on democracy to a new level. With dissatisfaction with his government growing, it detained his likely opponent in the next presidential election, Ekrem Imamoglu, the popular mayor of Istanbul, along with almost 100 of Mr. Imamoglu’s associates on dubious charges. The arrests put Turkey on the path that Russia has traveled over the past two decades, in which a democratically elected leader uses the powers of his office to turn it into an autocracy. ‘This is more than the slow erosion of democracy,’ Mr. Imamoglu wrote from Silivri Prison in these pages. ‘It is the deliberate dismantling of our republic’s institutional foundations.’”

While Donald Trump and his cronies haven’t yet duplicated all of these actions, they are clearly moving in that direction. Recently they have arrested a judge, threatened the country’s largest law firms, deported American citizens (admittedly children but still actual citizens), revoked valid visas, tried to silence whole universities, banned journalists, fired thousands of federal workers, and ignored the law, the courts, and the Constitution. So Mr. Imamoglu’s words regarding “the deliberate dismantling of our republic’s institutional foundations” can also be applied to Trump and his minions.

As Brian Greenspun said in his editorial in the Las Vegas Sun on Sunday (https://lasvegassun.com/news/2025/apr/27/please-donald-stop/), “The first move of dictators around the world is to shut down the courts and intimidate the lawyers. The next move is to silence the media. And Trump is doing his best on that score.”

But key questions remain:

  • Will they continue to arrest judges who displease them?
  • If the Supreme Court rules against them, will they obey or ignore?
    • Will they begin arresting the Democratic party leadership and potential opponents?
  • Will they continue deporting people including American citizens?
  • Will they try to change the Constitution?

Trump has already alluded to being President for a third term if not indefinitely. We have learned to our dismay that he does what he says he is going to do and that he believes he is not bound by any rules or laws. So, if he does run again, we can expect a heavily rigged election in 2028.

The challenge for us now is the one that Ben Franklin posed: “A Republic. If you can keep it.” The response to that challenge requires our strong and immediate actions. Make your voice heard. Write to your representatives at all levels of government. Even if they are Democrats and already agree with your point of view, it’s important to let them know where you stand. Talk to other people and raise your concerns.

As with Mr. Erdogan, dissatisfaction with Trump and his administration is growing. He may well follow the Turkish leader’s example and strike out even more forcefully at our institutional foundations.

Michele Fiore Escapes Justice

President Donald Trump has pardoned Michele Fiore. That’s right — she will now escape consequences for her federal conviction on six counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She was scheduled to be sentenced on May 14.

Fiore allegedly diverted monies received for her Las Vegas city council campaign, political action committee and her charity. She was accused of lying on her campaign finance reports.

Fiore has maintained her innocence and claimed she was singled out by the so-called “deep state” for her support of Donald Trump and Cliven Bundy. As you may recall, she stood by Bundy during his standoff with the federal government in our area in 2014, and his subsequent trial and acquittal.

Here is the order for a full and unconditional pardon.

Hearts as Cold as ICE

According to a recent Washington Post article (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/04/18/immigrant-detention-overcrowding-trump-crackdown/ by Douglas MacMillan), at a crowded Miami detention center, some immigrants are being held in conference rooms with no toilets. The Cibola County prison in New Mexico doesn’t have enough chairs for all the immigrant detainees to eat their meals at a table. And at Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, some immigrant women have been forced to sleep on thin mats on the concrete floor because all the beds in the female holding unit are taken.

The Trump administration’s efforts to boost deportations has increased the number of immigrant detainees so quickly that the government is failing to provide basic necessities, including beds and medical care, for some of them. Nearly half the people currently detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection have no criminal charges, federal data show, yet some are being held in conditions that would be unacceptable in high-security prisons. At the same time, the administration has eliminated two oversight bodies that ensured that facilities met health and safety requirements. Also, many of the facilities are nearly at or over their contracted capacities.

In other ICE-cold actions, the Department of Homeland Security denied Mahmoud Khalil permission to attend the birth of his first child, who was delivered at a New York hospital on Monday, according to the New York Times.

Instead, Mr. Khalil experienced the birth by telephone from Jena, La., more than 1,000 miles from the hospital where his wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, gave birth to a son. It is unclear when he will be able to see the baby.

Mr. Khalil, a legal permanent resident who was a prominent figure in pro-Palestinian demonstrations on the Columbia University campus, has been detained in Louisiana for more than a month. On Sunday morning, shortly after Dr. Abdalla went into labor, Mr. Khalil’s lawyers requested a two-week furlough so that he could attend the birth. Less than an hour after they made their request, Melissa Harper, the director of the New Orleans field office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, denied it.

Here in Nevada, the Nevada Immigrant Coalition (NIC) reports that there has been a surge in immigration enforcement activities in Las Vegas, with reports of ICE agents (working with other federal law enforcement agencies such as FBI, ATF, and/or US Marshals, among others) often operating in plainclothes and unmarked vehicles.

These actions have occurred at parks, markets, residences, and on the street sometimes during school drop-offs and pick-ups.

”While the full number of individuals detained is still unknown, the impact is clear: Families are being separated without warning and children are being ripped from their loved ones. Our community is living in fear and innocent people are being deported without accountability or justice. These attacks go beyond immigration. This is part of a broader, coordinated effort by this administration to silence dissent – criminalizing advocacy, threatening nonprofits, and targeting communities that dare to speak out. An attack on immigrants is an attack on all of us,” said Bethany Khan, spokeswoman for the Culinary Union and member of the Nevada Immigrant Coalition.

Martha Menéndez, a Nevada immigration attorney and also a member of the Nevada Immigrant Coalition said, “The biggest fear right now in the community is that folks don’t actually know which agencies are being deputized to act as ICE officers and detain Nevadans on ICE orders. Due process is under attack every day, but that doesn’t mean our rights don’t exist – they do, and we strongly encourage people to assert them. Everyone, regardless of status, should be prepared. If you are a legal permanent resident, carry your valid green card. If you have a valid work permit or a court document that shows you have deferred action or another type of protection, carry a copy of it with you. If you’re a U.S. citizen and are worried about being profiled, carry proof of your citizenship, such as a copy of your passport or passport card. Avoid carrying IDs, a passport, or a voter card from another country, as those can be used against you in immigration proceedings. Most importantly, remember that you have the right to remain silent and the right to speak to a lawyer. You do not have to answer questions about where you were born or your immigration status until you’ve spoken to an attorney. Stay alert and stay safe.”

Locally, I have not heard of any activities in Mesquite or Moapa Valley. I have asked Erika Castro of NIC by email about this but have not yet received a reply. If you know of any incidents in either place, please post a comment to this blog describing them.

Whether or not you see this happening, it is, and it’s wrong. Consider asking your representatives to try to intervene.

Western State AG’s Hear Range of Fear

On April 16th, four Western state Attorney Generals (AGs) met in Denver, Colorado, to hear a range of fears concerning Trump’s disastrous Make America Great Again (MAGA) strategy. 

Colorado Attorney General Philip J. Weiser introduced his fellow AGs, including Nick Brown of Washington, Anne Lopez of Hawaii, and Aaron Ford of Nevada. He told a packed house of concerned citizens that “nobody is above the law” and that “we live under the rule of law, not the rule of whim.” [i]

AG Brown followed Weiser, telling those assembled that not one of Trump’s actions, including his orders, is the law. Things we worry about, he said, like education, transportation, and health, are under threat and require actions by federal, state, and local governments and the people to resist Trump’s drive towards oligarchy.

A speaker taking to the microphone expressed concerns about losing Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds in Denver. She told the crowd that, in addition, hiring freezes were reducing farm support, impacting families with children, people with disabilities, and transgender individuals.  

The four AGs heard about Trump’s reduction of housing eligibility. A speaker told the AGs that the historical focus on the needs of homeless adults meant providing “Housing First” across all elements of the homelessness response system.

However, Trump moved to criminalize homelessness by appointing Robert Marbut to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Marbut proposed the “Housing Fourth” approach to criminalize panhandling, banish homeless services to city outskirts, and treat food and shelter as privileges, thus following Trump’s agenda of criminalizing homelessness.

The AGs and those attending heard that Trump’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) approach denies life-saving programs to transgender individuals while forcing Businesses to drop DEI programs out of fear of Trump’s retaliatory nature.  

Ola Kukoyi, the Executive Director of the Good Shepherd Organization, expressed her concerns about the acts of Immigration Enforcement to hinder free speech and their illegal deportation actions, which are creating a Constitutional Crisis leading to the end of fundamental human rights not seen since the Holocaust crisis.

When asked what they [AGs] are doing, AG Brown expressed his fear and that of his family, but said that none of that can match those fearing ICE snatching them off the streets. He pointed to Trump, Vance, Steven Miller, Kristi Noem, and Marco Rubio as lying. Brown said, “We cannot get used to it, even though we know it is going to happen,” adding, “We will continue to tell the truth, bring actions, and support people and organizations without a voice.” [ii]

The AGs heard concerns about Small business owners who depend on international cooperation feeling defeated, people going without homes, and a mental health crisis in the short and long term. They heard about Trump’s strategy to undermine transgender health needs.

The crowd and the AGs heard that the current federal administration emboldens a white national agenda while pushing bills to undermine fundamental human rights for millions, all of which require people to hold our federal government accountable to the law and increase awareness of these power abuses.

A speaker told of his friend who lived in a car with his wife and small child. Then, the Speaker said his friend got a job working in construction, but when two men attacked him, those assaulting him blamed him for the altercation, and ICE intervened, took his phone, and put him into custody while being denied legal help. Now, the Speaker said,  the man’s wife and child are on the streets.

Continuing, the Speaker reminded the crowd that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) continues to take people without due process under the guise of Christianity. The law is a social contract, the Speaker added, that when broken, fascism takes root. The Speaker said that’s where we are right now, then he asked, “Will anyone hold this administration accountable? The Speaker concluded by saying that we have no protection if we don’t do this right now.”

A Federal Firefighter Management Team member told those assembled that they had 44 teams last summer, reduced to 41 now, raising concerns about further drops. Trump has terminated 37% of the Forest Service firefighters, she said. 

Of course, speakers raised concerns about the Supreme Court’s decision to return the authority to regulate or ban abortion to individual states, resulting in criminal penalties in many of the states.


[i] President George W. Bush created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2002. He formed the largest, most extensive spy and enforcement ring in our Nation’s history. Before its creation, intelligence gathering fell into two separate domains under the National Security Act of 1947, including 1: Defense Agencies and the CIA, and 2: Domestic (FBI). Under that umbrella, powerful national intelligence assets (for example, the National Security Agency) were, with rare and judicially approved exceptions, not available for use within the borders of the United States, primarily to ensure that Constitutional rights remained inviolable and enforceable.

With the formation of DHS came the consolidation and merging of data records (Including recently IRS records), helicopters, planes, drones, Predators, and, most importantly, fusion centers across the country, allowing local and federal law enforcement to collaborate on intelligence gathering and surveillance. The internet also provides a significant source of information for U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Federal agencies monitor social media platforms for investigations and threat identification. However, the internet can also be used for propaganda, misinformation, secret operations, and counterintelligence.

DHS has a workforce of 260,000 employees and 22 components, including the Transportation Security Agency (TSA, Customs and Border Protection, Cyber Security and Information Security Agency (CISA), Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Coast Guard, Secret Service, Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers, and the Science and Technology Directorate.

With a Budget of $52.2 billion, Congress confirmed Trump’s pick of Kristi Noem, former Governor of South Dakota, with experience staging phony political stunts, to head HHS in January 2025

See Foley, Hoag, “State AG Insights”  for a list at: State AGs Take the Lead in First Month of Trump Opposition | State AG Insights | Foley Hoag LLP